Skip to main content
Gender Action Portal

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Main navigation

  • ABOUT GAP
    • Team
    • Land Acknowledgment
    • Intersectionality Statement
    • How to use GAP
  • RESOURCES
    • Intersectional Research Summaries
    • COVID-19 Summaries
    • Additional Resources
    • WAPPP Affiliated Faculty's Research
  • CONNECT
    • Recommend a Study
    • Newsletter
    • Work for GAP

Is Blinded Review Enough? How Gendered Outcomes Arise Even Under Anonymous Evaluation

Experiment Types
Difference in Differences
Study Participants
5,058 Participants
Locations
United States
Researchers
Julian Kolev
,
Yuly Fuentes-Medel
,
Fiona E. Murray
Publication
National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
Issue
Working Paper 25759
Month
April
Year
2019
Pages
42

Cite this Article

MLA

Kolev, Julian, Yuly Fuentes-Medel, and Fiona Murray. Is blinded review enough? How gendered outcomes arise even under anonymous evaluation. No. w25759. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019.

APA

Kolev, J., Fuentes-Medel, Y., & Murray, F. (2019). Is blinded review enough? How gendered outcomes arise even under anonymous evaluation (No. w25759). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Chicago

Kolev, Julian, Yuly Fuentes-Medel, and Fiona Murray. Is blinded review enough? How gendered outcomes arise even under anonymous evaluation. No. w25759. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019.

Download from original source

Focus Areas

Image
Education Icon

Economic Opportunity

Topics

Image
Bias Icon

Bias

Image
Competition Icon

Competition

Image
Decision Making Icon

Decision Making

Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email

Newsletter Signup

Connect with us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Home

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Footer Menu

  • WAPPP
  • HKS
  • HarvardU
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
  • Privacy Statement

©   The President and Fellows of Harvard College